Search Results - District eCourts India

AI-powered search results from District eCourts across India

Back to Home
Search Court Cases
General search across all case data (party names, CNR numbers, advocates, case details, etc.)
Search Specific Fields
Use these fields to search within specific data fields. You can use multiple fields together.
Search in petitioner and respondent names
Search by advocate name
Local case number
Search by court or complex name
Pro Tip: You can combine the main search above with these field-specific searches. For example, search "property dispute" in the main box and "Sahil Gupta" in advocate field to find property disputes handled by that lawyer.
15 results found for "The Spl. Tahsildar (La)" in 22 ms (Page 1 of 2)
AI-Powered Search
TNSA050001182005 28.8
Ravikumar and 13 others versus THE Spl Tahsildar LA
Court/Complex
Combined Courts, Salem
Advocate
RAJAN K TSELVAKUMAR. K.
Case Number
LAOP/1100050/2005
Status
Enquiry
Case Type
LAOP
Case Stage
Enquiry
Petitioner(s)
1) Ravikumar and 13 others
Advocate - RAJAN K T
Respondent(s)
1) THE Spl Tahsildar LA
Advocate - SELVAKUMAR. K.
View Details
TNSA050010252014 28.7
Saroja and 6 anothers versus The Spl Tahsildar LA Mettur
Court/Complex
Combined Courts, Salem
Advocate
RAJU .MSankar P
Case Number
EP/1100225/2014
Status
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
Case Type
EP
Case Stage
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
Petitioner(s)
1) Saroja and 6 anothers
Advocate - RAJU .M
Respondent(s)
1) The Spl Tahsildar LA Mettur
Advocate - Sankar P
View Details
TNTR3A0001392022 22.9
K.Dhayalan versus The Spl. Tahsildar(LA) Unit V
Court/Complex
Combined Courts, Ambattur
Advocate
GP
Case Number
LAOP/14/2022
Status
Steps
Case Type
LAOP
Case Stage
Steps
Petitioner(s)
1) K.Dhayalan
Advocate - GP
Respondent(s)
1) The Spl. Tahsildar(LA) Unit V
2) The Member Secretary


View Details
TNTR3A0001332022 22.9
Thilagavathi versus The Spl. Tahsildar(LA) Unit V
Court/Complex
Combined Courts, Ambattur
Advocate
GP
Case Number
LAOP/9/2022
Status
Evidence
Case Type
LAOP
Case Stage
Evidence
Petitioner(s)
1) Thilagavathi
Advocate - GP
Respondent(s)
1) The Spl. Tahsildar(LA) Unit V
2) The Member Secretary


View Details
KLER300001142022 22.9
Sarada versus The Powr Grid Corporation of India Ltd.
Court/Complex
COURT COMPLEX NORTH PARAVUR
Advocate
K.P. Johnson
Case Number
EP/100030/2022
Status
For Steps
Case Type
EP
Case Stage
For Steps
Petitioner(s)
1) Sarada
Advocate - K.P. Johnson
Respondent(s)
1) The Powr Grid Corporation of India Ltd.
2) The Spl. Tahsildar (LA)


View Details
TNTR3A0001322022 22.9
J.Seshachalam versus The Spl. Tahsildar(LA) Unit V
Court/Complex
Combined Courts, Ambattur
Advocate
GP
Case Number
LAOP/8/2022
Status
Evidence
Case Type
LAOP
Case Stage
Evidence
Petitioner(s)
1) J.Seshachalam
Advocate - GP
Respondent(s)
1) The Spl. Tahsildar(LA) Unit V
2) The Member Secretary


View Details
TNTR3A0001402022 22.8
K.Sivalingam versus The Spl. Tahsildar(LA) Unit V
Court/Complex
Combined Courts, Ambattur
Advocate
GP
Case Number
LAOP/15/2022
Status
Orders
Case Type
LAOP
Case Stage
Orders
Petitioner(s)
1) K.Sivalingam
Advocate - GP
Respondent(s)
1) The Spl. Tahsildar(LA) Unit V
2) The Member Secretary


View Details
TNTR3A0001512022 22.8
P.Jayaraman versus The Spl. Tahsildar(LA) Unit V
Court/Complex
Combined Courts, Ambattur
Advocate
GP
Case Number
LAOP/26/2022
Status
Evidence
Case Type
LAOP
Case Stage
Evidence
Petitioner(s)
1) P.Jayaraman
Advocate - GP
Respondent(s)
1) The Spl. Tahsildar(LA) Unit V
2) The Member Secretary


View Details
TNTR3A0001282022 22.8
R.Ponnammal versus The Spl. Tahsildar(LA) Unit V
Court/Complex
Combined Courts, Ambattur
Advocate
GP
Case Number
LAOP/4/2022
Status
Amendment
Case Type
LAOP
Case Stage
Amendment
Petitioner(s)
1) R.Ponnammal
Advocate - GP
Respondent(s)
1) The Spl. Tahsildar(LA) Unit V
2) The Member Secretary


View Details
TNTR3A0001302022 22.8
S.Visalakshi versus The Spl. Tahsildar(LA) Unit V
Court/Complex
Combined Courts, Ambattur
Advocate
GP
Case Number
LAOP/6/2022
Status
Arguments
Case Type
LAOP
Case Stage
Arguments
Petitioner(s)
1) S.Visalakshi
Advocate - GP
Respondent(s)
1) The Spl. Tahsildar(LA) Unit V
2) The Member Secretary


View Details
/* Add new CSS for autocomplete */