Search Results - District eCourts India

AI-powered search results from District eCourts across India

Back to Home
Search Court Cases
General search across all case data (party names, CNR numbers, advocates, case details, etc.)
Search Specific Fields
Use these fields to search within specific data fields. You can use multiple fields together.
Search in petitioner and respondent names
Search by advocate name
Local case number
Search by court or complex name
Pro Tip: You can combine the main search above with these field-specific searches. For example, search "property dispute" in the main box and "Sahil Gupta" in advocate field to find property disputes handled by that lawyer.
9 results found for "Principal Secretary Urban Development" in 25 ms (Page 1 of 1)
AI-Powered Search
Himaksh Sharma versus The Principal Secretary, Urban Development
Court/Complex
Shimla
Advocate
Arun Kumar Verma
Case Number
Suit For Declaration/49/2025
Status
Service
Case Type
Suit For Declaration
Case Stage
Service
Petitioner(s)
1) Himaksh Sharma
Advocate - Arun Kumar Verma
Respondent(s)
1) The Principal Secretary, Urban Development
2) The Registrar of Birth and Death

3) General Public


Kamal Somnath Rajurkar versus The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Urban Development
Court/Complex
Pune, District and Sessions Court
Advocate
Kelkar Krishna Dattatray
Case Number
R.C.S./420/2016
Case Type
R.C.S.
Case Stage
Hearing
Petitioner(s)
1) Kamal Somnath Rajurkar
Advocate - Kelkar Krishna Dattatray
Respondent(s)
1) The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Urban Development
2) The Commissioner, Pune Municipal Corporation
Advocate -Satpute
3) Slum Rehabilitation Authority/Asst. Commissioner


M/s Dayanand Prasad Sinha versus The State of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Patna
Court/Complex
DJ Div. Patna Sadar
Advocate
Naresh Mohan Pandey
Case Number
Execution/12/2025
Status
Appearence
Case Type
Execution
Case Stage
Appearence
Petitioner(s)
1) M/s Dayanand Prasad Sinha
Advocate - Naresh Mohan Pandey
Respondent(s)
1) The State of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Patna
2) The Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Deparment

3) The Managing Director, Patna Smart City

4) The Chief General Manager, Patna Smart City

5) The Sr. Manager Tech, Smart City

6) The Sr. Manager M and E Project in charge


Govind Karodimal Bajaj versus Nagpur Municipal Corporation thr. Municpal Commissioner
Court/Complex
Nagpur, District Sessions Court III
Advocate
R. R. GourAmit R. Prasad
Case Number
R.C.S./1653/2022
Status
Compliance
Case Type
R.C.S.
Case Stage
Compliance
Petitioner(s)
1) Govind Karodimal Bajaj
Advocate - R. R. Gour
Respondent(s)
1) Nagpur Municipal Corporation thr. Municpal Commissioner
Advocate - Amit R. Prasad
2) Assistant Commissioner,

3) State of Maharashtra thr. Principal Secretary Urban Development Department


Rahul Brijkishore Agrawal versus Nagpur Municipal Corporation thr. Municipal Commitssioner,
Court/Complex
Nagpur, District Sessions Court III
Advocate
Ramesh Ram SinghPallavi Mahashabde
Case Number
R.C.S./1587/2022
Status
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Case Type
R.C.S.
Case Stage
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Petitioner(s)
1) Rahul Brijkishore Agrawal
Advocate - Ramesh Ram Singh
Respondent(s)
1) Nagpur Municipal Corporation thr. Municipal Commitssioner,
Advocate - Pallavi Mahashabde
2) Assistant Commissioner

3) Deputy Engineer (PWD)

4) State of Maharashtra thr. Principal Secretary Urban Development Department


RAJESH HARISHCHANDRA KENY versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI
Court/Complex
Kurla, MM Court
Advocate
ADV YADNESH AHER
Case Number
Misc/5101330/2022
Status
MISC CASES
Case Type
Misc
Case Stage
VERIFICATION
Petitioner(s)
1) RAJESH HARISHCHANDRA KENY
Advocate - ADV YADNESH AHER
Respondent(s)
1) MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI
2) JOINT MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER FOR GREATER MUMBAI

3) SHIV KOLIWADA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD

4) M/S PILOT CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.

5) THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

6) THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOUSING DEPARTMENT

7) THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY

8) STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, SENIOR INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SION POLICE STATION


Anusuya versus Nafisa
Court/Complex
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,MUDIGERE
Advocate
B.T.NATRAJH.K. DEVARAJ
Case Number
O.S./41/2025
Status
For filing written Statement
Case Type
O.S.
Case Stage
For filing written Statement
Petitioner(s)
1) Anusuya
Advocate - B.T.NATRAJ
Respondent(s)
1) Nafisa
Advocate - H.K. DEVARAJ
2) The Panchayath Development Officer, Hesagal Grama Panchayat, K.M. Road, Bilagula Village, Mudigere Taluk.

3) The Executive Officer, Taluk Panchayat, Mudigere, Mudigere Taluk.
Advocate -N.S. JAYARAM
4) The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Panchayath, Chikkamagaluru District.
Advocate -N.S. JAYARAM
5) The Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Karnataka, Bengaluru.

6) The Government of Karnataka, Rept. by Chief Secretary to Government, Vidhana Soudha, Bengaluru.

7) Fathima
Advocate -H.K. DEVARAJ
8) Hameed M.H.
Advocate -H.K. DEVARAJ
9) Hajirabi
Advocate -H.K. DEVARAJ
10) Jameela
Advocate -H.K. DEVARAJ
11) Mutaz
Advocate -H.K. DEVARAJ
12) Mohammad Rafeeq

13) Abdul Sathar
Advocate -H.K. DEVARAJ

Deepak Dinanath Lotlikar versus Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Limited
Court/Complex
Small Causes Court, Dhobi Talao, Mumbai
Advocate
Kocharekar Ajit A.Shah Jay V.
Case Number
RAD/967/2023
Status
Reply In Notice At 11 AM
Case Type
RAD
Case Stage
Reply In Notice At 11 AM
Petitioner(s)
1) Deepak Dinanath Lotlikar
Advocate - Kocharekar Ajit A.
Respondent(s)
1) Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Limited
Advocate - Shah Jay V.
2) The Managing Director Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Limited

3) The Chief of Regional Disputes Redressal Committee and Tahsildar

4) Sangita Warade The Developer

5) Union of India Through the Secretary Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs

6) General Manager Western Railway

7) State of Maharashtra Through the Principal Secretary Urban Development Department

8) The Collector of Mumbai

9) Vasav Enterprises Private Limited

10) Kalpana Dinanath Lotlikar


SRI. M.N. SADASHIVA. versus THE PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT, M.G.M. HOSPITAL, K.M.ROAD, MUDIGERE TALUK. Rept. by its Officer.
Court/Complex
CIVIL JUDE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
Advocate
B.T.NATRAJ
Case Number
O.S./9/2025
Status
HEARING
Case Type
O.S.
Case Stage
HEARING
Petitioner(s)
1) SRI. M.N. SADASHIVA.
Advocate - B.T.NATRAJ
Respondent(s)
1) THE PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT, M.G.M. HOSPITAL, K.M.ROAD, MUDIGERE TALUK. Rept. by its Officer.
2) DISTRICT HEALTH OFFICER, PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT. K.M. ROAD, CHIKKAMAGALURU.

3) THE PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, (PDO) Hale Mudigere Gram Panchayath.

4) THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER. Taluk Panchayath, Mudigere.

5) THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, Zilla Panchayath. Chikkamagaluru.

6) THE THASILDHAR. MUDIGERE TALUK.

7) THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER. CHIKKAMAGALURU SUB-DIVISION, CHIKKAMAGALURU.

8) THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHIKKAMAGALURU.

9) THE REGIONAL COMMISSIONER. MYSORE REGION, HIGHVIEW,

10) THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF KARNATAKA, REVENUE DEPARTMENT.

11) THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA. Rept.by Chief Secretary to Government.

12) THE CHIEF OFFICER, TOWN PANCHAYATH. MUIDGERE.

13) THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, GOVT. OF KARNATAKA,

14) THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF KARNATAKA.


/* Add new CSS for autocomplete */