Search Results - District eCourts India

AI-powered search results from District eCourts across India

Back to Home
Search Court Cases
General search across all case data (party names, CNR numbers, advocates, case details, etc.)
Search Specific Fields
Use these fields to search within specific data fields. You can use multiple fields together.
Search in petitioner and respondent names
Search by advocate name
Local case number
Search by court or complex name
Pro Tip: You can combine the main search above with these field-specific searches. For example, search "property dispute" in the main box and "Sahil Gupta" in advocate field to find property disputes handled by that lawyer.
304 results found for "Director(Administration)" in 35 ms (Page 1 of 31)
AI-Powered Search
S. Thirugnanassambandane versus The Director, Local Administration Department
Court/Complex
Integrated Courts, Puducherry
Advocate
N.K. Perumal
Case Number
OS/1087/2024
Status
Written Statement
Case Type
OS
Case Stage
Written Statement
Petitioner(s)
1) S. Thirugnanassambandane
Advocate - N.K. Perumal
Respondent(s)
1) The Director, Local Administration Department
State Of Maharashtra At The Instance Drugs Inspector Food And Drugs Administration Gadchiroli versus Ashwani Lamba, Director
Court/Complex
Gadchiroli, Dist and Session Court
Advocate
Food and Drug Administration Gadchiroli
Case Number
S.C.C./637/2023
Status
Awaiting Summons
Case Type
S.C.C.
Case Stage
Awaiting Summons
Petitioner(s)
1) State Of Maharashtra At The Instance Drugs Inspector Food And Drugs Administration Gadchiroli
Advocate - Food and Drug Administration Gadchiroli
Respondent(s)
1) Ashwani Lamba, Director
2) Navdeep Kumar Dhingara

3) Asha Dhingara

4) Ashwani Kumar

5) Mrityunjay Kumar Sinha

6) Ankit Mittal

7) Shruti Soni

8) Oscar Remedies Pvt Ltd


POONAM versus DIRECTOR (ADMINISTRATION)
Court/Complex
Senior Civil Judge cum RC, North, RHC
Advocate
Subodh Kumar Jha
Case Number
Misc SCJ/229/2024
Status
Misc. cases / purpose
Case Type
Misc SCJ
Case Stage
Misc. cases / purpose
Petitioner(s)
1) POONAM
Advocate - Subodh Kumar Jha
Respondent(s)
1) DIRECTOR (ADMINISTRATION)
2) MANAGING DIRECTOR


Dharmaraj S/o. karupaiah versus The Administration Director, Tamilnadu Government Transport Corporation, Karaikudi
Court/Complex
Combined Courts, Ramanathapuram
Advocate
Thiru. Deva Manoharan Martin
Case Number
MCOP/244/2022
Status
Orders
Case Type
MCOP
Case Stage
Orders
Petitioner(s)
1) Dharmaraj S/o. karupaiah
Advocate - Thiru. Deva Manoharan Martin
Respondent(s)
1) The Administration Director, Tamilnadu Government Transport Corporation, Karaikudi
Kishor Tryambakrao Dharmadhikari and 1 versus 1. Commissioner Director of Municipal Administration Mumbai and 3
Court/Complex
Nagpur, Industrial and Labour Court
Advocate
S.U.Bhuyar
Case Number
Complaint ULP/90/2024
Status
ISSUE NOTICE
Case Type
Complaint ULP
Case Stage
ISSUE NOTICE
Petitioner(s)
1) Kishor Tryambakrao Dharmadhikari and 1
Advocate - S.U.Bhuyar
Respondent(s)
1) 1. Commissioner Director of Municipal Administration Mumbai and 3
Jothikrishnan versus The Director and Municipal Administration,
Court/Complex
Combined Courts, Tiruttani
Advocate
M.Baskar
Case Number
MCOP/73/2022
Status
Ex-Parte Evidence
Case Type
MCOP
Case Stage
Ex-Parte Evidence
Petitioner(s)
1) Jothikrishnan
Advocate - M.Baskar
Respondent(s)
1) The Director and Municipal Administration,
2) The Municipality Commissioner


Ganesh Udaram Patre versus Commissioner and Director Municipal Administration and 2
Court/Complex
Nagpur, Industrial and Labour Court
Advocate
P C MarpakwarM I DHATRAK
Case Number
Complaint ULP/106/2021
Status
ARGUMENT
Case Type
Complaint ULP
Case Stage
ARGUMENT
Petitioner(s)
1) Ganesh Udaram Patre
Advocate - P C Marpakwar
Respondent(s)
1) Commissioner and Director Municipal Administration and 2
Advocate - M I DHATRAK
UNITECH LTD versus CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION
Court/Complex
District Court Chandigarh
Advocate
SIDHARATH BATRA
Case Number
ARB/825/2021
Status
Arguments
Case Type
ARB
Case Stage
Arguments
Petitioner(s)
1) UNITECH LTD
Advocate - SIDHARATH BATRA
Respondent(s)
1) CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION
2) DIRECTOR TOURISM


UNITECH LIMITED versus CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION
Court/Complex
District Court Chandigarh
Advocate
KARAN NEHRA
Case Number
EXE/145/2023
Status
Arguments
Case Type
EXE
Case Stage
Arguments
Petitioner(s)
1) UNITECH LIMITED
Advocate - KARAN NEHRA
Respondent(s)
1) CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION
2) DIRECTOR TOURISM


The Secretary-administration,kseb,pattom,thiruvananthapuram versus The Managing Director
Court/Complex
DISTRICT COURT ERNAKULAM
Advocate
LAKSHMY.S
Case Number
OP MV/100085/2022
Status
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Case Type
OP MV
Case Stage
For production of documents/Affidavit
Petitioner(s)
1) The Secretary-administration,kseb,pattom,thiruvananthapuram
Advocate - LAKSHMY.S
Respondent(s)
1) The Managing Director
2) Aniruhan K.s.

3) New India Insurance Company Ltd.


/* Add new CSS for autocomplete */