Farhan Khan @ Farhan Husain versus Mintu Kumar - Order No: 5

MACP No. 586/2019 Farhan Khan Vs. Mintu Kumar & Ors.

7. 1. 2021 Present: Sh. J. P. Rajput, counsel for petitioner. Proxy counsel for R3/ United India Ins. Co. Ltd. Sh. Jamesh, counsel for R5/ Royal Sundaram GIC Ltd. Again petitioner failed to furniSh. complete particulars of R1, current address of R4 aND details of R2. It is mentioned that chargesheet is yet to be filed. It is observed that sufficient opportunities have already been granted to the petitioner to furniSh. the details. In absence of required details, no effective proceedings can be conducted. Thus, in view of last order, petitioner is burdened with cost of Rs. 500/ to be deposited with DLSA (East) . Further, petitioner shall not be entitled to interest till the time all the respondents are not served. Petitioner shall remain present in person on next date along with the required documents. Put up for further proceedings on 03. 05. 2021. ** (Vivek Kumar Gulia) PO MACT (East) /KKD/Delhi 07. 01. 2021**

PS: Copyright: eCourtsIndia.com. AI-enhanced; accuracy may vary.

References: Case Number - MACT/586/2019 | Case Type - MACT | CNR Number - DLET010049002019 | Complex Name - Karkardooma Court Complex | Court Name - 4-ms. Mayuri Singh-Presiding Off.-MACT | Filing Date - 30-05-2019 | Judge Name - 4-Presiding Off.-Mact | List Date - 2025-05-05 | Order Date - 2021-01-07 | Order Number - 5 | Petitioner Advocates - J P Rajput | Petitioner Parties - Farhan Khan @ Farhan Husain Advocate - J P Rajput | Respondent Parties - Mintu Kumar2) Driver Particulars Disclose By Owner Respondent No 1 3) United India Insurance Co Ltd 4) Bhupendra Kumar Dwivedi 5) Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd 6) Ajay Pal S/O Shri Gorey Lal | Status - Miscellaneous Cases