Directorate Of Enforcement versus M/S Jindal Steel And Power Ltd And Ors | Order Dated Wed, 18 Jan 2023

Directorate Of Enforcement versus M/S Jindal Steel And Power Ltd And Ors - Order No: 81

Case and Order Information

Case Number: CR Cases/1/2019

Parties: Directorate Of Enforcement versus M/S Jindal Steel And Power Ltd And Ors

Order Number: 81

Filing Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018

Order Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023

Order Description: COPY OF ORDER

Status: Arguments on Charge

Stage: Arguments on Charge

Download Authenticated True Copy
Your authenticated true copy is ready for download.

Order Content

(1) CNR NO. DLCT11-000949-2019

CC NO. 248/2019 (Old CC Nos. 44/2016 & 03/15) RC No. 219 2013 (E) 0006; Branch: CBI/EO-I/New Delhi CBI vs. M/s Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. & Ors. U/s. 120-B IPC, 120-B/420 IPC & Section 7, 12 & 13(1)(d) PC Act,1988

(2) CNR No. DLCT11-001302-2019

CC No. 314/2019 (Old CC No. 13/17)

RC No. 219 2015 (E) 0004; Branch: CBI, EO-I/New Delhi CBI vs. M/s Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. (JSPL) & Ors.

U/s 120-B/420 IPC

(3) CNR No. DLCT11-000452-2019

CRC No. 01/2019 (Old CRC No. 08/18)

ECIR No. 12/DLZO/2014;

Branch: Delhi Zonal Office, Zone-II.

ED vs. M/s Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. & Ors.

Offence u/s 3 and punishable u/s 4 PMLA, 2002

18.01.2023

Present: Ld. DLAs Sh. A.P. Singh and Sh. Sanjay Kumar along with Ld. Sr. PP Sh. N.P. Srivastava for CBI.

Ld. Counsel Sh. Rajesh Batra, Ld. Special PP Sh. N.K. Matta along with Ld. Advocates Sh. Ansh Singh Luthra, Sh. Prabhas Bajaj and Ms. Sonia Kukreja for Directorate of Enforcement (all through VC).

Sh. Gurpreet Singh Parwanda, Ld. Counsel for Applicant/Accused Sh. Naveen Jindal.

APPLICATIONS DATED 17.01.2023 ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT SH. NAVEEN JINDAL FOR SEEKING AN EXTENSION OF THE ORDER DATED 14.07.2022, THEREBY CONTINUING THE OPERATION OF THE ORDER DATED 13.03.2019 TILL CONCLUSION OF TRIAL AND ALSO SEEKING PERMISSION TO TRAVEL TO UK, SPAIN, GUINEA, MOZAMBIQUE, VENEZUELA, OMAN, UAE & ALGERIA FROM 26.01.2023 TO 06.02.2023.

This order shall dispose of the applications dated 17.01.2023 moved on behalf of applicant/accused Sh. Naveen Jindal praying (i) for extending the operation of order dated 14.07.2022, thereby continuing the operation of the order dated 13.09.2019 till conclusion of trial thereby permitting the applicant to travel abroad subject to applicant intimating this court three days prior to his visits abroad; and (ii) for permitting the applicant to travel to UK, Spain, Guinea, Mozambique, Venezuela, Oman, UAE & Algeria from 26.01.2023 to 06.02.2023 in connection with his business interests.

It is mentioned in the applications that the applicant/ accused Sh. Naveen Jindal for business interests is required to travel to UK, Spain, Guinea, Mozambique, Venezuela, Oman, UAE & Algeria from 26.01.2023 to 06.02.2023. The invitations in this regard are enclosed with these applications as Annexure A-4 (Colly) .

The applicant has mentioned in the applications the details of the addresses where he would be staying during the period of his aforesaid visits.

The applicant has mentioned that no prejudice shall be caused to the prosecution and/or any proceedings including trial before this Court shall be hampered/delayed in his absence as there are no dates fixed before this court during the said dates of travel. He undertakes that he will not dispute his identity and will not challenge the proceedings conducted during this period. It is further stated in the applications that he has instructed his Counsels not to seek any adjournment in the matter on the ground of his absence. The applicant has mentioned that he shall appear through his Counsel Sh. Rajeev Goyal and/or Mr. Gurpreet S. Parwanda on each and every date and

shall remain present himself as and when so directed and his presence is required in connection with the present three cases.

The applicant has also given his mobile number, where he would be always available/reachable.

On behalf of CBI and ED, reply is not filed but the applications have been opposed by Sh. A.P. Singh, Ld. DLA for CBI and Sh. Rajesh Batra, Ld. Counsel for ED. They submitted that the applications be disposed off taking into account the present facts and circumstances of the case and also subject to the condition that the proceedings should not be hampered during the period of his travel abroad.

This Court has considered the submissions made on behalf of Ld. Counsel for the applicant/accused, Sh. A.P. Singh, Ld. DLA for CBI and Sh. Rajesh Batra, Ld. Counsel for ED.

A perusal of records shows that the accused has traveled abroad several times in the past and returned to India to face the trial within the stipulated period. Out of three matters, only in one matter i.e. CC No. 248/2019, prosecution evidence was being recorded and applicant/accused has already undertaken that he will not dispute his identity and will not question the legitimacy of proceedings conducted in his absence and in the presence of his Counsel on the ground of his absence during such period of travel.

Therefore, in the considered opinion of this Court, the applicant/accused is entitled to permission of the Court to travel abroad to UK, Spain, Guinea, Mozambique, Venezuela, Oman, UAE & Algeria from 26.01.2023 to 06.02.2023.

The conditions for this permission shall be as under:-

  •  He shall intimate the court about his travel plan in future not later than three days before actual date of journey and also furnish complete itinerary.
  •  He shall furnish FD for a sum of Rs. One crore (Cumulatively in all the three cases i.e. RC No. 219 2013 (E) 0006 titled CBI vs M/s JSPL; RC No. 219 2015 (E) 0004 titled CBI vs M/s JSPL and ECIR No. 12/DLZO/2014 titled ED vs M/s JSPL)
  •  He shall inform to the IO and the Court about his arrival to India mentioning the details of the places visited by him along with the other details of the itinerary within seven days of his arrival. The applicant/accused shall also file complete copy of his passport alongwith the copy of Visa in the Court on his return.
  •  He shall not tamper with the evidence nor try to influence any witness in any manner and will not use the permission granted to him so as to hamper the trial in any manner.
  •  This permission shall be subject to other applicable rules and will not be deemed as directions to any authority except the permission from the side of the Court .
  •  His Advocate Sh. Rajeev Goyal/Sh. Gurpreet Singh Parwanda shall undertake to accept notice from the Court/IO, if any, on behalf of the applicant in his absence and shall further undertake that in case the presence of applicant is required during the aforesaid period he shall immediately intimate the applicant and the applicant shall return to India within 48 hours.
  •  He shall intimate the Court about his contact addresses where he would be staying and his contact numbers.

The first prayer in the application is for extending the operation of order dated 14.07.2022, thereby continuing the operation of the order dated 13.09.2019 till conclusion of trial thereby

permitting the applicant to travel abroad subject to applicant intimating this court three days prior to his visits abroad.

Sh. A.P. Singh, Ld. DLA for CBI and Sh. Rajesh Batra, Ld. Special PP for ED have opposed the request of Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused Sh. Naveen Jindal for continuing the operation of orders dated 13.09.2019 and 14.07.2022 till conclusion of trial.

During the course of arguments, Sh. Gurpreet Singh Parwanda, Ld. Counsel appearing for applicant/accused Sh. Naveen Jindal submitted that the period for extending the operation of order dated 14.07.2022 be extended further for a period of six months only and not till conclusion of trial. Ld. DLA for CBI and Ld. Special PP for ED have not objected to the same.

Heard. Considered.

Considering the fact that the applicant/accused has to visit abroad frequently which necessitates filing of applications every time for seeking permission of this Court before leaving abroad, it is directed that orders dated 13.03.2019 and 14.07.2022 directing that before leaving the country the accused shall intimate the Court not later than three days before the actual date of journey about his travel plan, itinerary and his contact addresses during the said travel are further extended for a period of six months. The applicant Sh. Naveen Jindal shall also comply with other terms and conditions of orders dated 13.03.2019 and 14.07.2022 before traveling abroad every time.

However, it is made clear that the accused shall remain present on each date of hearing unless ordered otherwise.

Accordingly, orders dated 13.03.2019 and 14.07.2022 are restored further for a period of six months.

These applications are accordingly disposed off.

Put up the matters now on their respective next dates of hearing.

A copy of this order be given dasti to Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused, as prayed for.

ARUN BHARDWAJ Special Judge (PC Act) (CBI) Coal Block Cases-01, RADC, New Delhi/18.01.2023

(1) CNR NO. DLCT11-000949-2019

CC NO. 248/2019 (Old CC Nos. 44/2016 & 03/15)

RC No. 219 2013 (E) 0006; Branch: CBI/EO-I/New Delhi

CBI vs. M/s Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. & Ors.

U/s. 120-B IPC, 120-B/420 IPC &

Section 7, 12 & 13(1)(d) PC Act,1988

(2) CNR No. DLCT11-001302-2019

RC No. 219 2015 (E) 0004; Branch: CBI, EO-I/New Delhi

CBI vs. M/s Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. (JSPL) & Ors.

(3) CNR No. DLCT11-000452-2019

ED vs. M/s Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. & Ors.

18.01.2023

Proceedings

Present: Ld. DLAs Sh. A.P. Singh and Sh. Sanjay Kumar along

with Ld. Sr. PP Sh. N.P. Srivastava for CBI.

Ld. Counsel Sh. Rajesh Batra, Ld. Special PP Sh.

N.K. Matta along with Ld. Advocates Sh. Ansh Singh

Luthra, Sh. Prabhas Bajaj and Ms. Sonia Kukreja for

Directorate of Enforcement (all through VC).

Sh. Gurpreet Singh Parwanda, Ld. Counsel for

Applicant/Accused Sh. Naveen Jindal.

APPLICATIONS DATED 17.01.2023 ON BEHALF

OF THE APPLICANT SH. NAVEEN JINDAL FOR SEEKING

AN EXTENSION OF THE ORDER DATED 14.07.2022,

THEREBY CONTINUING THE OPERATION OF THE ORDER

DATED 13.03.2019 TILL CONCLUSION OF TRIAL AND ALSO

SEEKING PERMISSION TO TRAVEL TO UK, SPAIN,

GUINEA, MOZAMBIQUE, VENEZUELA, OMAN, UAE &

ALGERIA FROM 26.01.2023 TO 06.02.2023.

Page 1 of 6

This order shall dispose of the applications dated

17.01.2023 moved on behalf of applicant/accused Sh. Naveen Jindal

praying (i) for extending the operation of order dated 14.07.2022,

thereby continuing the operation of the order dated 13.09.2019 till

conclusion of trial thereby permitting the applicant to travel abroad

subject to applicant intimating this court three days prior to his visits

abroad; and (ii) for permitting the applicant to travel to UK, Spain,

Guinea, Mozambique, Venezuela, Oman, UAE & Algeria from

26.01.2023 to 06.02.2023 in connection with his business interests.

It is mentioned in the applications that the applicant/

accused Sh. Naveen Jindal for business interests is required to travel

to UK, Spain, Guinea, Mozambique, Venezuela, Oman, UAE &

Algeria from 26.01.2023 to 06.02.2023. The invitations in this regard

are enclosed with these applications as Annexure A-4 (Colly).

The applicant has mentioned in the applications the

details of the addresses where he would be staying during the period

of his aforesaid visits.

The applicant has mentioned that no prejudice shall be

caused to the prosecution and/or any proceedings including trial

before this Court shall be hampered/delayed in his absence as there

are no dates fixed before this court during the said dates of travel. He

undertakes that he will not dispute his identity and will not challenge

the proceedings conducted during this period. It is further stated in the

applications that he has instructed his Counsels not to seek any

adjournment in the matter on the ground of his absence. The applicant

has mentioned that he shall appear through his Counsel Sh. Rajeev

Goyal and/or Mr. Gurpreet S. Parwanda on each and every date and

Page 2 of 6

shall remain present himself as and when so directed and his presence

is required in connection with the present three cases.

The applicant has also given his mobile number, where

he would be always available/reachable.

On behalf of CBI and ED, reply is not filed but the

applications have been opposed by Sh. A.P. Singh, Ld. DLA for CBI

and Sh. Rajesh Batra, Ld. Counsel for ED. They submitted that the

applications be disposed off taking into account the present facts and

circumstances of the case and also subject to the condition that the

proceedings should not be hampered during the period of his travel

abroad.

This Court has considered the submissions made on

behalf of Ld. Counsel for the applicant/accused, Sh. A.P. Singh, Ld.

DLA for CBI and Sh. Rajesh Batra, Ld. Counsel for ED.

A perusal of records shows that the accused has traveled

abroad several times in the past and returned to India to face the trial

within the stipulated period. Out of three matters, only in one matter

i.e. CC No. 248/2019, prosecution evidence was being recorded and

applicant/accused has already undertaken that he will not dispute his

identity and will not question the legitimacy of proceedings conducted

in his absence and in the presence of his Counsel on the ground of his

absence during such period of travel.

Therefore, in the considered opinion of this Court, the

applicant/accused is entitled to permission of the Court to travel

abroad to UK, Spain, Guinea, Mozambique, Venezuela, Oman, UAE

& Algeria from 26.01.2023 to 06.02.2023.

Page 3 of 6

 He shall intimate the court about his travel

plan in future not later than three days before actual

date of journey and also furnish complete itinerary.

 He shall furnish FD for a sum of Rs. One crore

(Cumulatively in all the three cases i.e. RC No. 219

2013 (E) 0006 titled CBI vs M/s JSPL; RC No. 219

2015 (E) 0004 titled CBI vs M/s JSPL and ECIR No.

12/DLZO/2014 titled ED vs M/s JSPL)

 He shall inform to the IO and the Court about

his arrival to India mentioning the details of the places

visited by him along with the other details of the

itinerary within seven days of his arrival. The

applicant/accused shall also file complete copy of his

passport alongwith the copy of Visa in the Court on his

return.

 He shall not tamper with the evidence nor try to

influence any witness in any manner and will not use

the permission granted to him so as to hamper the trial

in any manner.

 This permission shall be subject to other

applicable rules and will not be deemed as

directions to any authority except the permission

from the side of the Court.

 His Advocate Sh. Rajeev Goyal/Sh. Gurpreet

Singh Parwanda shall undertake to accept notice from

the Court/IO, if any, on behalf of the applicant in his

absence and shall further undertake that in case the

presence of applicant is required during the aforesaid

period he shall immediately intimate the applicant and

the applicant shall return to India within 48 hours.

 He shall intimate the Court about his contact

addresses where he would be staying and his

contact numbers.

The first prayer in the application is for extending the

operation of order dated 14.07.2022, thereby continuing the operation

of the order dated 13.09.2019 till conclusion of trial thereby

Page 4 of 6

permitting the applicant to travel abroad subject to applicant

intimating this court three days prior to his visits abroad.

Sh. A.P. Singh, Ld. DLA for CBI and Sh. Rajesh Batra,

Ld. Special PP for ED have opposed the request of Ld. Counsel for

applicant/accused Sh. Naveen Jindal for continuing the operation of

orders dated 13.09.2019 and 14.07.2022 till conclusion of trial.

During the course of arguments, Sh. Gurpreet Singh

Parwanda, Ld. Counsel appearing for applicant/accused Sh. Naveen

Jindal submitted that the period for extending the operation of order

dated 14.07.2022 be extended further for a period of six months only

and not till conclusion of trial. Ld. DLA for CBI and Ld. Special PP

for ED have not objected to the same.

Considering the fact that the applicant/accused has to

visit abroad frequently which necessitates filing of applications every

time for seeking permission of this Court before leaving abroad, it is

directed that orders dated 13.03.2019 and 14.07.2022 directing that

before leaving the country the accused shall intimate the Court not

later than three days before the actual date of journey about his travel

plan, itinerary and his contact addresses during the said travel are

further extended for a period of six months. The applicant Sh. Naveen

Jindal shall also comply with other terms and conditions of orders

dated 13.03.2019 and 14.07.2022 before traveling abroad every time.

However, it is made clear that the accused shall remain

present on each date of hearing unless ordered otherwise.

Accordingly, orders dated 13.03.2019 and 14.07.2022 are

restored further for a period of six months.

Page 5 of 6

These applications are accordingly disposed off.

Put up the matters now on their respective next dates of

hearing.

A copy of this order be given dasti to Ld. Counsel for

applicant/accused, as prayed for.

ARUN BHARDWAJ

Special Judge (PC Act) (CBI)

Coal Block Cases-01, RADC,

New Delhi/18.01.2023

Page 6 of 6

Document information last updated: Wed, 17 Sep 2025, 02:32 AM IST