Directorate Of Enforcement versus M/S Jindal Steel And Power Ltd And Ors | Order Dated Tue, 26 Apr 2022

Directorate Of Enforcement versus M/S Jindal Steel And Power Ltd And Ors - Order No: 36

Case and Order Information

Case Number: CR Cases/1/2019

Parties: Directorate Of Enforcement versus M/S Jindal Steel And Power Ltd And Ors

Order Number: 36

Filing Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018

Order Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022

Order Description: COPY OF ORDER

Status: Arguments on Charge

Stage: Arguments on Charge

Download Authenticated True Copy
Your authenticated true copy is ready for download.

Order Content

IN THE COURT OF SH. ARUN BHARDWAJ, SPECIAL JUDGE (PC ACT) (CBI), COAL BLOCK CASES-01, RADC, NEW DELHI

(1) CNR NO. DLCT11-000949-2019

CC NO. 248/2019 (Old CC Nos. 44/2016 & 03/15)

RC No. 219 2013 (E) 0006;

Branch: CBI/EO-I/New Delhi

CBI vs. M/s Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. & Ors.

U/s. 120-B IPC, 120-B/420 IPC & Section 7, 12 & 13(1)(d) PC Act,1988

(2) CNR No. DLCT11-001302-2019

CC No. 314/2019 (Old CC No. 13/17)

RC No. 219 2015 (E) 0004;

Branch: CBI, EO-I/New Delhi

CBI vs. M/s Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. (JSPL) & Ors.

U/s 120-B/420 IPC

(3) CNR No. DLCT11-000452-2019

CRC No. 01/2019 (Old CRC No. 08/18) ECIR No. 12/DLZO/2014

Branch: Delhi Zonal Office, Zone-II.

ED vs. M/s Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. & Ors.

Offence u/s 3 and punishable u/s 4 PMLA, 2002

The hearing of the present matter is being taken up in hybrid form i.e. physically as well as via Cisco WebEx Platform (on the request of Ld. ALA for CBI, Ld. Counsel for ED as well as applicant Sh. Naveen Jindal) in the presence of:

26.04.2022

Proceedings

Present:

Ld. ALA Sh. V.K. Sharma (through VC), Ld. Sr. PP Sh. A.P. Singh, Ld. DLA Sh. Sanjay Kumar and Ld. Sr. PP Sh. N.P. Srivastava for CBI.

Ld. Counsel Sh. Rajesh Batra, Ld. Special PP Sh. N.K. Matta along with Ld. Advocates Sh. Ansh Singh Luthra and Ms. Sonia Kukreja for Directorate of Enforcement (all through VC).

Applicant/accused Sh. Naveen Jindal (through VC).

Ld. Counsels Sh. Vijay Aggarwal and Sh. Nagesh Behl for applicant/accused Sh. Naveen Jindal.

THREE APPLICATIONS DATED 20.04.2022 ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT/ACCUSED SH. NAVEEN JINDAL FOR SEEKING PERMISSION TO TRAVEL TO NIGERIA, GUINEE, GHANA & MOZAMBIQUE FROM 30.04.2022 TO 07.05.2022 AND TO ITALY, UK AND USA FROM 14.05.2022 TO 01.06.2022.

This order shall dispose of the applications dated 20.04.2022 moved on behalf of applicant/accused Sh. Naveen Jindal for seeking permission to travel to Nigeria, Guinee, Ghana & Mozambique from 30.04.2022 to 07.05.2022 and to Italy, UK and USA from 14.05.2022 to 01.06.2022.

It is mentioned in the applications that the applicant/accused Sh. Naveen Jindal, for business interests is required to travel to Nigeria from 30.04.2022 to 02.05.2022, to Guinee from 02.05.2022 to 03.05.2022, to Ghana from 03.05.2022 to 04.05.2022 and to Mozambique from 04.05.2022 to 07.05.2022 to hold business meetings. Invitations to travel Nigeria, Guinee, Ghana and Mozambique are enclosed with these applications as Annexure A-1, Annexure A-2, Annexure A-3 and Annexure A-4 respectively. Thereafter, the applicant/accused Sh. Naveen Jindal will return to India and thereafter he will again travel to Italy from 14.05.2022 to 19.05.2022 to attend the marriage ceremony of his niece. The invitation in this regard is enclosed with these applications as Annexure A-5 . Thereafter, the applicant/accused is required to travel to UK from 19.05.2022 to 22.05.2022 and to USA from 22.05.2022 to 01.06.2022 to hold business meetings. The invitations to travel to UK and USA are enclosed with these applications as Annexure A-6 and Annexure A-7 respectively.

The applicant has mentioned in the applications the details of the addresses where he would be staying during this period.

The applicant has mentioned that no prejudice shall be caused to the prosecution and/or any proceedings including trial before this Court shall be hampered/delayed in his absence as he will not dispute his identity and will not challenge proceedings conducted during this period. It is further stated in the applications that he has instructed his Counsel not to seek any adjournment in the matter on the ground of his absence. The applicant has mentioned that he shall appear through his Counsel Sh. Rajeev Goyal and/or Mr. Gurpreet S. Parwanda

on each and every date and shall remain present himself as and when so directed and his presence is required in connection with the present three cases.

The applicant has also given his mobile number, where he would be always available.

On behalf of CBI and ED, reply is not filed but the applications have been opposed by Sh. V.K. Sharma, Ld. ALA for CBI and Sh. Rajesh Batra, Ld. Counsel for ED. They submitted that the applications be disposed of taking into account the present facts and circumstances of the case and also subject to the condition that the proceedings should not be hampered during the period of his travel abroad.

This Court has considered the submissions made on behalf of Ld. Counsel for the applicant/accused, Sh. V.K. Sharma, Ld. ALA for CBI and Sh. Rajesh Batra, Ld. Counsel for ED.

A perusal of records shows that the accused has traveled abroad several times in the past and returned to India to face the trial within the stipulated period. Out of three matters, in one matter (CC No. 314/2019), further investigation is going on and only in one matter prosecution evidence (in CC No. 248/2019) was being recorded and applicant/accused has already undertaken that he will not dispute his identity and will not question the legitimacy of proceedings conducted in his absence and in the presence of his Counsel on the ground of his absence during such period of travel. In the third case which is CR No. 1/2019, supplementary complaint is under consideration of the Court.

Therefore, in the considered opinion of this Court, the applicant/accused is entitled to permission of the Court to travel abroad to Nigeria, Guinee, Ghana & Mozambique from 30.04.2022 to 07.05.2022 and to Italy, UK and USA from 14.05.2022 to 01.06.2022

The conditions for this permission shall be as under:-

  •  He shall furnish FD for a sum of Rs. One crore (Cumulatively in all the three cases i.e. RC No. 219 2013 (E) 0006 titled CBI vs M/s JSPL; RC No. 219 2015 (E) 0004 titled CBI vs M/s JSPL and ECIR No. 12/DLZO/2014 titled ED vs M/s JSPL)
  •  He shall inform to the IO and the Court about his arrival to India mentioning the details of the places visited by him along with the other details of the itinerary within seven days of his arrival. The applicant/accused shall also file complete copy of his passport alongwith the copy of Visa in the Court on his return.
  •  He shall not tamper with the evidence nor try to influence any witness in any manner and will not use the permission granted to him so as to hamper the trial in any manner.
  •  This permission shall be subject to other applicable rules and will not be deemed as directions to any authority except the permission from the side of the Court .
  •  His Advocate Sh. Rajeev Goyal shall undertake to accept notice from the Court/IO, if any, on behalf of the applicant in his absence and shall further undertake that in case the presence of applicant is required during the aforesaid period he shall immediately intimate the applicant and the applicant shall return to India within 48 hours.
  •  He shall intimate the Court about his contact addresses where he would be staying and his contact numbers.

These applications are accordingly disposed of.

Put up the matters now on their respective next dates of hearing.

A copy of this order be given dasti to Ld. Counsel for applicant/ accused, as prayed for.

ARUN BHARDWAJ Special Judge (PC Act) (CBI) Coal Block Cases-01, RADC, New Delhi/26.04.2022

IN THE COURT OF SH. ARUN BHARDWAJ, SPECIAL JUDGE (PC ACT) (CBI),

(1)

(2)

(3)

COAL BLOCK CASES-01, RADC, NEW DELHI

CNR NO. DLCT11-000949-2019

CC NO. 248/2019 (Old CC Nos. 44/2016 & 03/15)

CBI vs. M/s Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. & Ors.

Uls. 120-B IPC, 120-B/420 IPC & Section 7, 12 & 13(1)(d) PC Act,1988

CNR No. DLCT11-001302-2019

CBI vs. M/s Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. (JSPL) & Ors.

UIs 120-B/420 IPC

CNR No. DLCT11-000452-2019

CRC No. 01/2019 (Old CRC No. 08/18)

ECIR No. 12/DLZ0/2014

Branch: Delhi Zonal Office, Zone-ll.

ED vs. M/s Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. & Ors.

The hearing of the present matter is being taken up in hybrid

form i.e. physically as well as via Cisco WebEx Platform (on the request of

Ld. ALA for CBI, Ld. Counsel for ED as well as applicant Sh. Naveen Jindal)

in the presence of:

26.04.2022

Present: Ld. ALA Sh. V.K. Sharma (through VC), Ld. Sr. PP Sh. A.P. Singh,

Ld. DLA Sh. Sanjay Kumar and Ld. Sr. PP Sh. N.P. Srivastava for

CBI.

Ld. Counsel Sh. Rajesh Batra, Ld. Special PP Sh. N.K. Matta

along with Ld. Advocates Sh. Ansh Singh Luthra and Ms. Sonia

Kukreja for Directorate of Enforcement (all through VC).

Ld. Counsels Sh. Vijay Aggarwal and Sh. Nagesh Behl for

applicantilaccused Sh. Naveen Jindal.

Page 1 of 4

THREE APPLICATIONS DATED 20.04.2022 ON BEHALF OF

APPLICANT/ACCUSED SH. NAVEEN JINDAL FOR SEEKING PERMISSION TO

TRAVEL TO NIGERIA, GUINEE, GHANA & MOZAMBIQUE FROM 30.04.2022

TO 07.05.2022 AND TO ITALY, UK AND USA FROM 14.05.2022 TO 01.06.2022.

This order shall dispose of the applications dated 20.04.2022 moved

on behalf of applicant/accused Sh. Naveen Jindal for seeking permission to travel

to Nigeria, Guinee, Ghana & Mozambique from 30.04.2022 to 07.05.2022 and to

Italy, UK and USA from 14.05.2022 to 01.06.2022.

It is mentioned in the applications that the applicant/accused Sh.

Naveen Jindal, for business interests is required to travel to Nigeria from

30.04.2022 to 02.05.2022, to Guinee from 02.05.2022 to 03.05.2022, to Ghana

from 03.05.2022 to 04.05.2022 and to Mozambique from 04.05.2022 to

07.05.2022 to hold business meetings. Invitations to travel Nigeria, Guinee,

Ghana and Mozambique are enclosed with these applications as Annexure A-1,

Annexure A-2, Annexure A-3 and Annexure A-4 respectively. Thereafter, the

applicant/accused Sh. Naveen Jindal will return to India and thereafter he will

again travel to Italy from 14.05.2022 to 19.05.2022 to attend the marriage

ceremony of his niece. The invitation in this regard is enclosed with these

applications as Annexure A-5. Thereafter, the applicant/accused is required to

travel to UK from 19.05.2022 to 22.05.2022 and to USA from 22.05.2022 to

01.06.2022 to hold business meetings. The invitations to travel to UK and USA are

enclosed with these applications as Annexure A-6 and Annexure A-7

respectively.

The applicant has mentioned in the applications the details of the

addresses where he would be staying during this period.

The applicant has mentioned that no prejudice shall be caused to

the prosecution and/or any proceedings including trial before this Court shall be

hampered/delayed in his absence as he will not dispute his identity and will not

challenge proceedings conducted during this period. It is further stated in the

applications that he has instructed his Counsel not to seek any adjournment in the

matter on the ground of his absence. The applicant has mentioned that he shall

appear through his Counsel Sh. Rajeev Goyal and/or Mr. Gurpreet S. Parwanda

Page 2 of 4

on each and every date and shall remain present himself as and when so directed

and his presence is required in connection with the present three cases.

The applicant has also given his mobile number, where he would be

always available.

On behalf of CBI and ED, reply is not filed but the applications have

been opposed by Sh. V.K. Sharma, Ld. ALA for CBI and Sh. Rajesh Batra, Ld.

Counsel for ED. They submitted that the applications be disposed of taking into

account the present facts and circumstances of the case and also subject to the

condition that the proceedings should not be hampered during the period of his

travel abroad.

This Court has considered the submissions made on behalf of Ld.

Counsel for the applicant/accused, Sh. V.K. Sharma, Ld. ALA for CBI and Sh.

Rajesh Batra, Ld. Counsel for ED.

A perusal of records shows that the accused has traveled abroad

several times in the past and returned to India to face the trial within the stipulated

period. Out of three matters, in one matter (CC No. 314/2019), further

investigation is going on and only in one matter prosecution evidence (in CC No.

248/2019) was being recorded and applicant/accused has already undertaken that

he will not dispute his identity and will not question the legitimacy of proceedings

conducted in his absence and in the presence of his Counsel on the ground of his

absence during such period of travel. In the third case which is CR No. 1/2019,

supplementary complaint is under consideration of the Court.

Therefore, in the considered opinion of this Court, the

applicant/accused is entitled to permission of the Court to travel abroad to Nigeria,

Guinee, Ghana & Mozambique from 30.04.2022 to 07.05.2022 and to Italy, UK

and USA from 14.05.2022 to 01.06.2022

 He shall furnish FD for a sum of Rs. One crore (Cumulatively

in all the three cases i.e. RC No. 219 2013 (E) 0006 titled CBI

vs M/s JSPL; RC No. 219 2015 (E) 0004 titled CBI vs M/s

JSPL and ECIR No. 12/DLZO/2014 titled ED vs M/s JSPL)

Page 3 of 4

 He shall inform to the IO and the Court about his arrival to

India mentioning the details of the places visited by him along

with the other details of the itinerary within seven days of his

arrival. The applicant/accused shall also file complete copy of

his passport alongwith the copy of Visa in the Court on his

return.

 He shall not tamper with the evidence nor try to influence any

witness in any manner and will not use the permission granted

to him so as to hamper the trial in any manner.

 This permission shall be subject to other applicable rules

and will not be deemed as directions to any authority

except the permission from the side of the Court.

 His Advocate Sh. Rajeev Goyal shall undertake to accept

notice from the Court/IO, if any, on behalf of the applicant in

his absence and shall further undertake that in case the

presence of applicant is required during the aforesaid period

he shall immediately intimate the applicant and the applicant

shall return to India within 48 hours.

 He shall intimate the Court about his contact addresses where

he would be staying and his contact numbers.

These applications are accordingly disposed of.

A copy of this order be given dasti to Ld. Counsel for applicant/

accused, as prayed for.

ARUN BHARDWAJ

Special Judge (PC Act) (CBI)

Coal Block Cases-01, RADC,

New Delhi/26.04.2022

Page 4 of 4

Document information last updated: Sat, 06 Sep 2025, 06:19 AM IST