Directorate Of Enforcement versus M/S Jindal Steel And Power Ltd And Ors | Order Dated Wed, 06 Sep 2023

Directorate Of Enforcement versus M/S Jindal Steel And Power Ltd And Ors - Order No: 135

Case and Order Information

Case Number: CR Cases/1/2019

Parties: Directorate Of Enforcement versus M/S Jindal Steel And Power Ltd And Ors

Order Number: 135

Filing Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018

Order Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2023

Order Description: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

Status: Arguments on Charge

Stage: Arguments on Charge

Download Authenticated True Copy
Your authenticated true copy is ready for download.

Order Content

(1) CNR NO. DLCT11-000949-2019

CC NO. 248/2019 (Old CC Nos. 44/2016 & 03/15)

RC No. 219 2013 (E) 0006; Branch: CBI/EO-I/New Delhi

CBI vs. M/s Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. & Ors.

U/s. 120-B IPC, 120-B/420 IPC & Sec 7, 12 & 13(1)(d) PC Act,1988

(2) CNR No. DLCT11-001302-2019

CC No. 314/2019 (Old CC No. 13/17)

RC No. 219 2015 (E) 0004; Branch: CBI, EO-I/New Delhi CBI vs. M/s Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. (JSPL) & Ors.

U/s 120-B/420 IPC

(3)

CNR No. DLCT11-000452-2019;

CRC No. 01/2019 (Old CRC No. 08/18)

ECIR No.12/DLZO/2014; Branch:Delhi Zonal Office, Zone-II.

ED vs. M/s Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. & Ors.

Offence u/s 3 and punishable u/s 4 PMLA, 2002

Matter taken up today on receipt of below mentioned applications:06.09.2023.

As directed vide Circular Nos. 01/RG/DHC/2023 Dated 05.06.2023 and 2551/DHC/Gaz./G-2/2022 dated 11.05.2022 of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi issued in terms of W.P. (C) 6432/2022 and CM Appl. 19474-76/2022 titled Raj Gaurav vs Hon'ble High Court of Delhi & Ors dated 11.05.2022 and circulated vide No. 255264/DHC/Gaz./G-2/2022 dated 11.05.2022 and also as communicated vide Orders No. Hybrid Hearing/Gaz./RACC/Gaz./2022/14924C to 14970C dated 17.05.2022 and Hybrid Hearing/Gaz./RACC/Gaz./ 2022/15756-15800-C dated 26.05.2022 of Officer In-Charge (Judl), RACC, New Delhi, the hearing of the present matter is being taken up in hybrid form i.e. physically as well as via Cisco WebEx Platform in the presence of:

Proceedings

Present:

Ld. DLA Sh. A.P. Singh for CBI (through VC).

Ld. Special PPs Sh. Rajesh Batra and Sh. N.K. Matta along with Ld. Advocate Sh. Ansh Singh Luthra for ED (all through VC).

Sh. Gurpreet Singh Parwanda, Ld. Counsel for Applicant/accused Sh. Naveen Jindal.

I. APPLICATIONS DATED 06.09.2023 ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT SH. NAVEEN JINDAL FOR PERMISSION TO TRAVEL TO OMAN AND UAE FROM 11.09.2023 TO 13.09.2023.

Through these applications, the applicant/accused Naveen Jindal has prayed for permission to travel to Oman and UAE from 11.09.2023 to 13.09.2023, in connection with his business interests.

The applicant/accused has mentioned in these applications the itinerary of his travel, details of the addresses/Hotels where he would be staying during the period of his aforesaid visit. The applicant/accused undertakes to file the detailed itinerary about the countries visited, after returning to India.

The applicant has also mentioned in these applications, his mobile number, where he would be always available/reachable.

The applicant has mentioned that no prejudice shall be caused to the prosecution and/or any proceedings including trial before this Court shall be hampered/delayed in his absence. He has undertaken that he will not dispute his identity nor question the legitimacy of any proceedings done including recording prosecution evidences in his absence and in the presence of his counsel on the ground of his absence. It is further stated in the applications that he has instructed his Counsels not to seek any adjournment in the matter on the ground of his absence. The applicant has undertaken to remain present himself as and when so directed and his presence is required in connection with the present three cases.

Replies are not filed by CBI and ED but these applications are opposed.

A perusal of records shows that the accused has traveled abroad several times in the past and returned to India to face the trial within the stipulated period. Out of three matters, only in one matter i.e. CC No. 248/2019, prosecution evidence is being recorded and applicant/accused has already undertaken that he will not dispute his identity and will not question the legitimacy of proceedings conducted in his absence and in the presence of his Counsel on the ground of his absence during such period of travel.

Therefore, in the considered opinion of this Court, the applicant/accused is entitled to permission of the Court to travel abroad to Oman and UAE from 11.09.2023 to 13.09.2023, subject to following conditions:-

  •  He shall furnish FD for a sum of Rs. One crore (Cumulatively in all the three cases i.e. RC No. 219 2013 (E) 0006 titled CBI vs M/s JSPL; RC No. 219 2015 (E) 0004 titled CBI vs M/s JSPL and ECIR No. 12/DLZO/2014 titled ED vs M/s JSPL)
  •  He shall inform to the IO of CBI and ED and the Court about his arrival to India mentioning the details of the places visited by him along with the other details of the itinerary within seven days of his arrival. The applicant/accused shall also file complete copy of his passport alongwith the copy of Visa in the Court on his return.
  •  He shall not tamper with the evidence nor try to influence any witness in any manner and will not use the permission granted to him so as to hamper the trial in any manner.
  •  This permission shall be subject to other applicable rules and will not be deemed as directions to any authority except the permission from the side of the Court .
  •  His Advocate Sh. Rajeev Goyal/Sh. Gurpreet Singh Parwanda shall undertake to accept notice from the Court/IO, if any, on behalf of the applicant in his absence and shall further undertake that in case the presence of applicant is required during the aforesaid period he shall immediately intimate the applicant and the applicant shall return to India within 48 hours.
  •  He shall intimate the Court about his contact addresses where he would be staying and his contact numbers.

With these directions, the above mentioned applications are disposed off.

Put up the cases now on their respective next dates of hearings.

A copy of this order be given dasti to Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused, as prayed for.

UNDERTAKINGS OF ADVOCATE GURPREET SINGH PARWANDA IN TERMS OF ORDER DATED 06.09.2023.

In compliance of today's order, separate undertakings have been filed by Ld. Counsel Sh. Gurpreet Singh Parwanda in each case.

Soft copy supplied to Ld. DLA for CBI as well as Ld. Special PP for ED.

The undertakings so furnished are taken on record.

(ARUN BHARDWAJ)

SPECIAL JUDGE, (PC ACT) (CBI), COAL BLOCK CASES-01, RADC, NEW DELHI/06.09.2023

(1) CNR NO. DLCT11-000949-2019

CC NO. 248/2019 (Old CC Nos. 44/2016 & 03/15)

CBI vs. M/s Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. & Ors.

U/s. 120-B IPC, 120-B/420 IPC & Sec 7, 12 & 13(1)(d) PC

Act,1988

(2) CNR No. DLCT11-001302-2019

RC No. 219 2015 (E) 0004; Branch: CBI, EO-I/New Delhi

CBI vs. M/s Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. (JSPL) & Ors.

(3) CNR No. DLCT11-000452-2019;

ECIR No.12/DLZ0O/2014; Branch:Delhi Zonal Office,

Zone-II.

ED vs. M/s Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. & Ors.

Matter taken up today on receipt of below mentioned

applications:-

06.09.2023.

As directed vide Circular Nos. 01/RG/DHC/2023 Dated

05.06.2023 and 2551/DHC/Gaz./G-2/2022 dated 11.05.2022 of

Hon'ble High Court of Delhi issued in terms of W.P. (C) 6432/2022

and CM Appl. 19474-76/2022 titled Raj Gaurav vs Hon'ble High

Court of Delhi & Ors dated 11.05.2022 and circulated vide No. 2552-

64/DHC/Gaz./G-2/2022 dated 11.05.2022 and also as communicated

vide Orders No. Hybrid Hearing/Gaz./RACC/Gaz./2022/14924C to

14970C dated 17.05.2022 and Hybrid Hearing/Gaz./RACC/Gaz./

2022/15756-15800-C dated 26.05.2022 of Officer In-Charge (Judl),

RACC, New Delhi, the hearing of the present matter is being taken up

in hybrid form i.e. physically as well as via Cisco WebEx Platform in

the presence of:

Present: Ld. DLA Sh. A.P. Singh for CBI (through VC).

Ld. Special PPs Sh. Rajesh Batra and Sh. N.K. Matta

along with Ld. Advocate Sh. Ansh Singh Luthra for ED

(all through VC).

Sh. Gurpreet Singh Parwanda, Ld. Counsel for

Applicant/accused Sh. Naveen Jindal.

Page 1 of 4

  1. APPLICATIONS DATED 06.09.2023 ON BEHALF

OF APPLICANT SH. NAVEEN JINDAL FOR PERMISSION TO

TRAVEL TO OMAN AND UAE FROM 11.09.2023 TO

13.09.2023.

Through these applications, the applicant/accused

Naveen Jindal has prayed for permission to travel to Oman and UAE

from 11.09.2023 to 13.09.2023, in connection with his business

interests.

The applicant/accused has mentioned in these

applications the itinerary of his travel, details of the addresses/Hotels

where he would be staying during the period of his aforesaid visit. The

applicant/accused undertakes to file the detailed itinerary about the

countries visited, after returning to India.

The applicant has also mentioned in these applications,

his mobile number, where he would be always available/reachable.

The applicant has mentioned that no prejudice shall be

caused to the prosecution and/or any proceedings including trial

before this Court shall be hampered/delayed in his absence. He has

undertaken that he will not dispute his identity nor question the

legitimacy of any proceedings done including recording prosecution

evidences in his absence and in the presence of his counsel on the

ground of his absence. It is further stated in the applications that he

has instructed his Counsels not to seek any adjournment in the matter

on the ground of his absence. The applicant has undertaken to remain

present himself as and when so directed and his presence is required in

connection with the present three cases.

Replies are not filed by CBI and ED but these

applications are opposed.

Page 2 of 4

A perusal of records shows that the accused has traveled

abroad several times in the past and returned to India to face the trial

within the stipulated period. Out of three matters, only in one matter

i.e. CC No. 248/2019, prosecution evidence is being recorded and

applicant/accused has already undertaken that he will not dispute his

identity and will not question the legitimacy of proceedings conducted

in his absence and in the presence of his Counsel on the ground of his

absence during such period of travel.

Therefore, in the considered opinion of this Court, the

applicant/accused is entitled to permission of the Court to travel

abroad to Oman and UAE from 11.09.2023 to 13.09.2023, subject to

following conditions:-

 He shall furnish FD for a sum of Rs. One crore (Cumu-

latively in all the three cases i.e. RC No. 219 2013 (E) 0006 ti-

tled CBI vs M/s JSPL; RC No. 219 2015 (E) 0004 titled CBI vs

M/s JSPL and ECIR No. 12/DLZO/2014 titled ED vs M/s

JSPL)

 He shall inform to the IO of CBI and ED and the Court

about his arrival to India mentioning the details of the places

visited by him along with the other details of the itinerary

within seven days of his arrival. The applicant/accused shall

also file complete copy of his passport alongwith the copy of

Visa in the Court on his return.

 He shall not tamper with the evidence nor try to

influence any witness in any manner and will not use the per-

mission granted to him so as to hamper the trial in any manner.

 This permission shall be subject to other

applicable rules and will not be deemed as

directions to any authority except the permission from the

side of the Court.

 His Advocate Sh. Rajeev Goyal/Sh. Gurpreet Singh Par-

wanda shall undertake to accept notice from the Court/IO, if

any, on behalf of the applicant in his absence and shall further

undertake that in case the presence of applicant is required

during the aforesaid period he shall immediately intimate the

applicant and the applicant shall return to India within 48

hours.

Page 3 of 4

 He shall intimate the Court about his contact

addresses where he would be staying and his

contact numbers.

With these directions, the above mentioned applications

are disposed off.

Put up the cases now on their respective next dates of

hearings.

A copy of this order be given dasti to Ld. Counsel for

applicant/accused, as prayed for.

UNDERTAKINGS OF ADVOCATE GURPREET SINGH

PARWANDA IN TERMS OF ORDER DATED 06.09.2023.

In compliance of today's order, separate undertakings have

been filed by Ld. Counsel Sh. Gurpreet Singh Parwanda in each case.

Soft copy supplied to Ld. DLA for CBI as well as Ld. Special

PP for ED.

SPECIAL JUDGE, (PC ACT) (CBI),

COAL BLOCK CASES-01, RADC,

NEW DELHI/06.09.2023

Page 4 of 4

Document information last updated: Sat, 06 Sep 2025, 06:19 AM IST